Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
There is an option to build a Pybind11 module independent of the interpreter, see |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Did anyone had any luck with this? I haven't tried it yet, but I would love to replace python with pocketpy in the engine we use here in our studio. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I've built a C++ library that exposes it's API using pybind11 and I'm able to use the library functions from python under Linux. Howeverre, while building the library pybind11 needs to link against a CPython, which is not always possible in some of my build environements (as CPython is not supported by the compiler I'm using).
I came across pockectpy, which is a zero dependecy single file Python interpreter.
Can pybind11 be used with this library instead of CPython, which would allow me to have a fully standalone library with integrated Python interpretor.
I know that pocketpy does not expose all python functionalities but the supported feature are more than enough for my use case
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions