Replies: 2 comments
-
I agree this would be useful, the limited range of duty cycles currently supported was only for implementation simplicity. It would also be useful to be able to specify the pulse duration in ms rather than the duty cycle. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
for future reference, this was addressed with 3a60f89 Thanks Thomas! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
I think it would be nice to allow finer specification of duty cycle, say any integer between 5 and 95?
Is there reasoning for limiting it to 10, 25, 50 and 75% ?
code/pyControl/hardware.py
Line 401 in 5a9b9a2
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions