Geotiff Module

[tech4GT]

@jywarren If you happen to have any resources regarding this, it would be really helpful. 😄

Update: https://npmjs.com/geotiff

[jywarren]

Yes! publiclab/mapknitter#296 🙌🏽 We may need to fetch the coordinates from an earlier step though, so would need to pass along metadata somehow? Or I guess we could specify it in the initial multi image steps Json.

…

On Sun, Mar 31, 2019, 12:29 AM Varun Gupta ***@***.***> wrote: @jywarren <https://github.com/jywarren> If you happen to have any resources regarding this, it would be really helpful. 😄 — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/publiclab/image-sequencer/issues/962>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABfJ3o45FztLKtphZnXnvQtdHNcZQMFks5vcDlugaJpZM4cUHJ2> .

[tech4GT]

@jywarren So the idea of a module which is non chain-able is a little weird inside of Image sequencer. I was thinking maybe this can output the same input image as far as Image-sequencer is concerned but it maybe outputs the other data as a file and saves it. What do you think?

[harshkhandeparkar]

Why is it non chainable? Maybe we can return a new sequencer.

[jywarren]

Yeah I agree, but so the idea of an output module would be one which ends the sequence. It could still output a data url, but just not one in a format that another standard module could read. Later this idea could encompass an export to svg or PDF module, for example.

…

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 4:15 AM Harsh Khandeparkar ***@***.***> wrote: Why is it non chainable? Maybe we can return a new sequencer. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/publiclab/image-sequencer/issues/962#issuecomment-480731280>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABfJxBh8cmonyKQ0XWvosyA5CLqDUxbks5vevp4gaJpZM4cUHJ2> .

[tech4GT]

@jywarren hmm, I’m not sure I get you completely. So I was thinking that this module can just output the input, sequencer wise but would start a file download in the browser or on the node side save a file. Is this what you are thinking too?

[jywarren]

I think that'll work fine, sure! In any case we will be wanting to send it to Google cloud storage so that sounds good. If we ever wanted a data-url we could do that separately. I'm mainly suggesting a new standard mental model for the general behavior of "doing things with what image-sequencer produces", with the idea of a new type of module called an "output module", however we don't have to address this right now. Thanks!

…

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 8:56 AM Varun Gupta ***@***.***> wrote: @jywarren <https://github.com/jywarren> hmm, I’m not sure I get you completely. So I was thinking that this module can just output the input sequencer wise but would start a file download in the browser or on the node side save a file. Is this what you are thinking too? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/publiclab/image-sequencer/issues/962#issuecomment-480819953>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABfJ3Qu4l83QRLBnYHslz695FnEb9Ubks5vezxYgaJpZM4cUHJ2> .

[tech4GT]

Aha got it! So this output module supposedly ends the sequence if applied right?

[jywarren]

Yeahhh, it's not super important but with more output module types emerging I thought it might be a good idea to create some norms around and guidance.

…

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 9:38 AM Varun Gupta ***@***.***> wrote: Aha got it! So this output module supposedly ends the sequence if applied right? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/publiclab/image-sequencer/issues/962#issuecomment-480835302>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABfJz1GwtVTYUIjpmSHF9ZG3z_Y5bnvks5ve0ZRgaJpZM4cUHJ2> .

[tech4GT]

@jywarren I suppose this should be our next step??

[tech4GT]

I think this is all that is left as far as Image Sequencer is concerned, correct?
Apart from this we have to make a converter function for the json request and implement the workflow but thats on the app, right?
@jywarren

[harshkhandeparkar]

Hey @tech4GT I had a question, puppeteer runs a headless version of chromium right?

[tech4GT]

Depends, puppeteer-core can utilize whatever browser you have installed, it does not explicitly download chromium.

[harshkhandeparkar]

Can it be forced or add a rule to prioritize using firefox? Can it even use firefox btw?

[tech4GT]

@jywarren would love your input here, thanks! 😄

[jywarren]

Ah, well we do need the webgl-distort module in your new gl code, so we can go through the full distortion + compositing sequence with each image, right? Thanks!

…

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:41 PM Varun Gupta ***@***.***> wrote: @jywarren <https://github.com/jywarren> would love your input here, thanks! 😄 — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/publiclab/image-sequencer/issues/962#issuecomment-483758013>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABfJ7MCYmGnncBidBVhV9bUTh0ihYUOks5vhgD-gaJpZM4cUHJ2> .