Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support needed for camt.105.001.02 & camt.106.001.02 ISO20022 message types #128

Closed
amanisimpson7gss opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@amanisimpson7gss
Copy link

Hi,

On our platform, we have implemented support for the following 2 message types:

  • camt.105.001.02
  • camt.106.001.02

...However this library does not provide the mx models for the above 2 message types, so we are struggling to implement testing in our test-framework.

Please can the team add support for camt.105.001.02 & camt.106.001.02 ISO20022 message types.

Thanks,
Amani Simpson

@zubri
Copy link
Member

zubri commented Oct 10, 2024

Hi,

Those message types are part of the SRU2024 that we will make available for the general public soon.

@zubri zubri added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Oct 10, 2024
@amanisimpson7gss
Copy link
Author

Thanks @zubri for your reply.

Please could you advise on a rough estimated date-time of arrival for SRU2024.

Thanks,
Amani

@muhammadfarras
Copy link

muhammadfarras commented Oct 18, 2024

Thanks @zubri for your reply.

Please could you advise on a rough estimated date-time of arrival for SRU2024.

Thanks, Amani

Probably it will release one month before november changes. It must be this month

@zubri zubri self-assigned this Nov 8, 2024
@zubri
Copy link
Member

zubri commented Nov 8, 2024

Closing the issue. SRU2024 libraries were released already some weeks ago.

@zubri zubri closed this as completed Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants