You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Feature: add a JDBC-based implementation of the AFS interface (AppStorage in particular).
What is the current behavior?
Only MapDB implementation of AFS is provided.
If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce and if possible a minimal demo of the problem
What is the expected behavior?
We want to be able to use a relational database as the storage for AFS. As much as possible, the implementation should be vendor-independent. It should rely on a plain JDBC connection and not JPA, in order to keep it a "2 mayers" abstraction, not 3 layers.
What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
No "production ready" implementation of AFS is available in powsybl-core.
Please tell us about your environment:
Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, stacktraces, related issues, suggestions how to fix, links for us to have context, eg. stackoverflow, gitter, etc)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature: add a JDBC-based implementation of the AFS interface (AppStorage in particular).
Only MapDB implementation of AFS is provided.
If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce and if possible a minimal demo of the problem
What is the expected behavior?
We want to be able to use a relational database as the storage for AFS. As much as possible, the implementation should be vendor-independent. It should rely on a plain JDBC connection and not JPA, in order to keep it a "2 mayers" abstraction, not 3 layers.
No "production ready" implementation of AFS is available in powsybl-core.
Please tell us about your environment:
Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, stacktraces, related issues, suggestions how to fix, links for us to have context, eg. stackoverflow, gitter, etc)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: