Skip to content

Dealing with orders that contain multiple owners #71

@driket

Description

@driket

Context

Most of the time, there are different assets owners within a single order.
Thus, the delivery operator needs to keep track of the items ownerships.

Extra features development

2 years ago, I’ve modified the plugin to include 3 extra fields for each item in an order :

  • “Owner” & “Owner group”. They are automatically sent to inventory items during asset generation.
  • “Comment” is a free field allowing to help the delivery operator to know exactly what the item is. Can replace "Owner field" if user is not created yet.

screen_shot_2016-10-10_at_10_51_25

Feedback

Pros:

  • Delivery technician doesn’t have to open extra document to find out which assets belongs to which user
  • Auto-fills during delivery process seems to be less error prone

Cons:

  • Sometimes, the user doesn’t exist in GLPI/LDAP yet when the order is created. Then it’s not possible to process the automatic filling of user’s field in GLPI inventory. The "comment" field is then used as a workaround.

Sharing the modification

While this local modification has been appreciated in-house, I would like to know:

  • If this feature worth sharing in a pull request?
  • Does this feature break the purpose of the plugin / GLPI / ITIL?
  • What would be the common alternatives?

A lighter alternative

To just add one “Comment” field (string) for order items.

screen_shot_2016-10-10_at_16_37_44

Pros:

  • More general multi-purpose approach.
  • Allow delivery operator to keep track of items ownership within GLPI (without additional documents)
  • Help delivery operator to know exactly what the item is

Cons:

  • Delivery operator has to fill manually ownership field in inventory

Regards,

Cédric.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions