You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
May I ask that some time in the future the library would check the downloaded presets for consistancy based on the checksum as PG implemented? I ask because several times I faced issues with visually incomplete data, though no warnings or method fails rised.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
copych
changed the title
Preset checksum validating #enchancement
enchancement: Preset checksum validating
Apr 25, 2022
Can you give an example of what you mean? To do a checksum on the preset structure?
So a check_preset(SparkPreset xx) sort of thing?
But the compiler should issue a warning about a bad structure?
On 25 Apr 2022, at 07:51, copych ***@***.***> wrote:
May I ask that some time in the future the library would check the downloaded presets for consistancy based on the checksum as PG implemented? I ask because several times I faced issues with visually incomplete data, though no warnings or method fails rised.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
May I ask that some time in the future the library would check the downloaded presets for consistancy based on the checksum as PG implemented? I ask because several times I faced issues with visually incomplete data, though no warnings or method fails rised.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: