forked from KeeJef/LIPs
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fat-Tail Distribution in the VPN Market and its Implications for Long-Term Lokinet Monetization Strategies #56
Comments
Script for Data CollectionThe following script fetches the referenced data in our research, sorted by API_URL="https://api.appbrain.com/v2/info/search"
API_KEY="<api_key>"
QUERY="vpn"
SORT="RECENT_DOWNLOADS"
LIMIT="50"
for OFFSET in {0..500..50}; do
FILENAME="${OFFSET}.json"
curl -X GET --header 'Accept: application/json' "${API_URL}?apikey=${API_KEY}&query=${QUERY}&sort=${SORT}&offset=${OFFSET}&limit=${LIMIT}" > "$FILENAME"
sleep 1 # One-second pause to avoid rate limiting
done |
The power function model and chart referenced were generated using the following code:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Fat-Tail Distribution in the VPN Market and its Implications for Long-Term Lokinet Monetization Strategies
The VPN industry, valued at approximately $50 billion, presents Lokinet with an opportunity to revolutionize the sector by significantly reducing metadata leaks and enhancing user privacy. This analysis aims to guide Lokinet's long-term monetization strategies.
Measuring Market Share Distribution
To gauge market share distribution in the VPN industry, we use the rank vs frequency distribution as a proxy. In this framework, frequency denotes the recent download counts of Android VPN apps.
Data Collection
Data on recent download frequencies of VPN Android apps was acquired from AppBrain's
estimatedRecentDownloads
via its API. The search termVPN
on the AppBrain website generated over 9,400 results, but due to API limitations, our data collection is restricted to only the first 550 results.Data Analysis and Model Fitting
Upon plotting the data on a log-log scale, a power-law relationship emerged. Fitting the data to a power function yielded the model:
estimatedRecentDownloads = 87356508 * ranking ^ -1.259
The model's R-square value of 0.986 suggests a robust fit.
Implications of Fat-Tail Distribution
This model adheres to a discrete form of the power law, also known as the generalized Zipf Distribution. The exponent in this generalized Zipf Distribution,
-1.259
, signifies a fat-tailed distribution. The closer the exponent is to-1
, the fatter the tail. As this exponent approaches-1
, the generalized Zipf distribution transforms into a harmonic series with a divergent sum, contradicting to the 80/20 rule by allowing the tail to outweigh the head. Similar trends are often evident in search query distributions.In other words, in the VPN market, the tail is as significant as the head. This contrasts with many other industries that follow the 80/20 rule, but aligns with patterns commonly observed in the search engine sector. Note that in the data collection step, we ranked VPN Android apps by recent downloads; in our case, 'head' refers to major players, while 'tail' represents smaller VPN service providers.
VPN Market Characteristics
We offer an explanation for the fat-tail phenomenon in the VPN market:
Due to low entry barriers and highly diverse user demands influenced by factors like location, language, target regions, and various marketing channels, the VPN market demonstrates both a decentralized structure and a fat-tail distribution. This contrasts with many other industries, where a handful of top players dominate the market.
Strategic Insights for Lokinet
Coincidentally, the fat-tail distribution in the VPN market aligns well with Lokinet's decentralized ethos and anti-censorship mission. Whether approached from a revenue-generation perspective or a value-proposition angle, the optimal business strategy should target both the head and the tail of the market.
Proposed Long-term Lokinet Monetization Strategy
Considering the fat-tail phenomenon in the VPN market, to minimize marketplace leakage, we advocate a nominal fee-based business model for Lokinet, preferably speed-based pricing. To maintain low entry barriers, broaden Lokinet's user base and increase Lokinet's anonymity set, we recommend offering free access at limited speeds, with tiered pricing for faster service.
As a side note, as Lokinet's ecosystem grows, the usage of Lokinet's darknet could eventually rival the volume of clearnet traffic routed through Lokinet Exit nodes. One advantage of implementing a speed-based pricing model is that it allows both Lokinet Exit and Lokinet darknet to operate under a unified business model.
This long-term vision does not contradict short-to-mid-term strategies such as Enhancing the Awareness, Utility, and Anonymity Set of Oxen - Part 11 - Promoting Lokinet Exit Marketplace through Preview Generation and In-app Navigation of Clearnet URLs. It is common to bootstrap a business with one model while gradually migrating or expanding to another model.
The strategy entails cryptographic enforcement at the Lokinet protocol level and is most effective when payments are transacted in privacy-centric cryptocurrencies like Oxen or Monero. Technical execution specifics, however, are outside the scope of this analysis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: