valkey backend?
#1038
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
|
I'd be interested in maintaining support for valkey, if at some point it diverges in its API or behavior. If those hypothetical future changes just require minor workarounds, I'd prefer to keep it as a single backend class; but if there are major changes that somehow make that infeasible, then we could split that out into a separate backend. If you or someone else wanted to help out with this, the first step would be to add test containers to both GitHub Actions config and local docker-compose config, and then run Redis integration tests against both the Redis and valkey containers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Does anyone have experience using this library with valkey as an open source alternative to Redis?
Since valkey is more or less a drop-in replacement for Redis, this should probably work in theory. But since the two projects might diverge more in the future, I'm wondering if there is any interest in a separate Valkey backend.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions