Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
I totally agree with you, and I definitely want (at some point) to propose chat services. But it is not a priority for me, as there is so much more to do before. Domains like mail, contact and calendar (task, event, todo, journal, alarms) really lack of tools, and I find them more important that chat at this point. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Even if that's not the classical definition (?), a sensible and modern interpretation of PIM would involve chat. If PIM can be seen as a "personal CRM", i.e. a system to organize communications and associated contacts, then I can't come up with a sensible definition that wouldn't involve chat.
In the same space of foundational technologies, as Pimalaya is situatied, we have the Matrix chat protocol. Disregarding any concrete implementation of chat, Pimalaya may choose the Matrix protocol as a de-facto open standard and provide well-defined integration points towards that ecosystem so that third parties can build useful integrations on top.
The intuition behind this idea, rather to implement and maintain something in-tree, is to make it clear that Pimalaya has thought chat alongside the rest of PIM and concretely show third parties how integration points where designed and conceptualized, eventually backed by a minimal library implementation, if that turns out to make sense, at all.
In my opinion, it wouldn't be a bad idea to brainstorm this further.
Examplification: #4
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions