Skip to content

Conversation

@pmtk
Copy link
Member

@pmtk pmtk commented Dec 3, 2025

Python 3.14 changed the default start method from fork to spawn.
That results in global variables not being available in subprocesses spawned with futures.

This affects only recent enough systems (like Fedora 43) used as the hypervisor.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@pmtk: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

Python 3.14 changed the default start method from fork to spawn.
That results in global variables not being available in subprocesses spawned with futures.

This affects only recent enough systems (like Fedora 43) used as the hypervisor.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from agullon and eslutsky December 3, 2025 09:03
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 3, 2025
@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor

ggiguash commented Dec 4, 2025

/lgtm
/verified by ci

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ggiguash: This PR has been marked as verified by ci.

In response to this:

/lgtm
/verified by ci

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ggiguash, pmtk

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e956e17 and 2 for PR HEAD aa1f563 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 79c896c and 1 for PR HEAD aa1f563 in total

@pmtk
Copy link
Member Author

pmtk commented Dec 4, 2025

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 36493cf and 0 for PR HEAD aa1f563 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/hold

Revision aa1f563 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 4, 2025
@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor

ggiguash commented Dec 5, 2025

The CoreDNS failures are not related to the change in the build script. Overriding to save CI cycles.
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-periodic ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor

ggiguash commented Dec 5, 2025

/unhold
/verified by ci

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 5, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@ggiguash: Overrode contexts on behalf of ggiguash: ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic, ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm, ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-periodic, ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm

In response to this:

The CoreDNS failures are not related to the change in the build script. Overriding to save CI cycles.
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-periodic ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ggiguash: This PR has been marked as verified by ci.

In response to this:

/unhold
/verified by ci

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor

ggiguash commented Dec 5, 2025

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@ggiguash: Overrode contexts on behalf of ggiguash: ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests, ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@pmtk: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 1505610 into openshift:main Dec 5, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants