Skip to content

Web conference notes, 2024.06.06 (MDS Working Group)

Michael Schnuerle edited this page Jun 6, 2024 · 11 revisions

Web Conference

MDS Working Group

  • Monthly on Thursday at 9am PT, 12pm ET, 5/6pm CET

Conference Call Info

Zoom Registration Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZAscOmhpjIuHNakPx6CNbACpjUjw1Gsucr4

One tap mobile: +19294362866,,84170989462#,,,,*612987# US (New York) - though we encourage Zoom

Agenda

Meeting Agenda

MDS Digital Policy and Emergency Response for Robotaxis/AVs

  1. Intro and announcements (5 min)
  2. MDS 2.1 Release Plan (5 min) - Michael Schnuerle, OMF
    1. Robotaxis, emergency response, real-time policy, crashes, air taxis
  3. MDS Policy Overview (10 min) - Michael Schnuerle, OMF
  4. Seattle Robotaxi Emergency Response Automation (15 min) - Armand Shahbazian, Electric and Automated Mobility Policy Advisor, SDOT
  5. Discussion with Participants (20 mins)

WGSC Meeting Organizers

  • Host: Michael Schnuerle, OMF
  • Facilitator: Michael Schnuerle, OMF
  • Preparation: Michael Schnuerle, OMF
  • Outreach: Michael Schnuerle, OMF
  • Note taker: Gene Laynes, Chicago

Action Items and Decisions

  1. ...

Minutes

Notes

Agenda

  1. Intro and Announcements

  2. MDS 2.1 release plan

  3. MDS policy overview

  4. Seattle robotaxi - Emergency Response Automation

  5. Discussion

Notes:

Definition: AV: Automated Vehicles

Introduction

  • Michael Schnuerle

    • Intro to OMF / MDS
  • Em Burnett

    • Smart curb collaborative - Final chance to apply for funding
  • Andrew Hastings

    • OMF Summit this fall - November 12

      - Expanded full day event
      
      - Planned to coincide with the CoMotionLA conference
      
    • New OMF members

      - beam
      
      - appyway
      
      - cruise
      
      - TRANZITO SMART MOBILITY
      

MDS 2.1 Release Plan (Michael Schnuerle)

  • Clearer support for Autonomous Vehicles in passenger services mode (i.e. robotaxis)

  • Full support or real time policy for emergency response is / will be more explicitly supported

  • Considering data standards for crash reporting

MDS Policy overview

  • Shift from physical infrastructure to digital infrastructure

  • MDS enables two way communication between public / private entities and actors.

  • MDS Use cases includes things like fees and incentives, emergency guidance, event areas, no-ride zones / geofencing, policy and environmental goals.

  • OMF publishes sample policy language, how to guides, and RFP scoring language, contract renewal, etc.

  • Github - where everything happens outside of meetings (asynchronous content)

  • MDS Policy for passenger services

  • Question: How do you specify geographies for the data exchange?

    • Answer: it really depends on the specific connectors and

Seattle Department of Transportation

  • Armand Shabazian - Electric and automated mobility policy advisor at SDOT

  • Data for autonomous transportation awareness (DATA)

  • General Stats: 27% of Seattle is public space, 60% of Seattle's emissions come from vehicles.

  • Pillars of AV policy: Safety, Sustainability, Equity, Collaboration

  • Washington State Senate Bill 5594 addresses AVs is currently stalled, however...

  • State lawmakers allocated 500k for advancing WA AV services

  • SDOT is using this to demonstrate geofencing and other AV digital services

  • Timeline (2017-2024)

    • Starts with Mobility playbook in 2017

    • Includes collaboration with several private companies including Nvidia

    • Ends with 20 year plan for AVs and DATA program

  • Looking at San Francisco's experience (50 written reports of AV interference)

    • (see diagram) Complex flow of information and response when there is an incident with AVs that includes calls to AV

    • AVs are more challenging for engagement with first responders

  • Seattle's approach to avoiding AV interference is data driven and they are looking at digital tools to streamline operations.

    • Ingest real time data (911, crashes, etc.)

    • Translate to MDS

    • Create geofencing for "no go zones" for rerouting

    • monitor feed use for effectiveness

    • Share: create guide for other cities

  • Data flow

    • SaaS platform: (911 / Work zones / Traffic operations / events / traveler information API)

    • SaaS platform feeds into Policy Feed

    • Policy Feed feeds into Geofencing development

    • Geofencing feeds into downstream communication

  • Demonstration example of data flow (see slides)

  • Partners include State, OMF, University of Washington, and (TBD) private SaaS company.

  • Contact:

  • [email protected]

  • https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/projects-and-programs/programs/new-mobility-program

  • Question: how do you evaluate the results?

    • Looking at the impact on staff time, and for better processes (currently involves manual entry)
  • How will you coordinate the feeds from a staffing perspective?

    • Still developing, but we're getting good quotes from external services, we plan to depend on existing state APIs.
Clone this wiki locally