Plans to implement reserveMultipleObjectInstanceNames in IEEE1516e impl?

[anthonycramp]

Hey Portico Chaps,

For the NATO MSG 136 project, I wrote a federate that used reserveMultipleObjectInstanceNames against the Pitch RTI. Testing that code as part of MSG164, we've found that this function is not yet implemented in Portico's IEEE1516e implementation (portico/codebase/src/java/portico/org/portico/impl/hla1516e/Rti1516eAmbassador.java).

Any plans to implement that service on the roadmap?

[timpokorny]

@anthonycramp - I believe we can do that. Doing a number of infrastructure changes at the moment that would make this a bit easier (central RTI process for "management" things like keeping track of name reservations). Can fold it into that. Expecting to get all that squared away in the next ~4w.