You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Discussing ocsf/ocsf-schema#1146 during the community call brought up the possibility of enforcing the "See Specific Usage" convention more rigorously.
The server already emits a warning if descriptions with "See Specific Usage" aren't overridden in their specific usage.
The assertion is that enums with only the default "0"/"99" values defined in dictionary.json should have "See Specific Usage" in their description.
So an additional check should be added to ensure non-specific enums have this string in their description.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Discussing ocsf/ocsf-schema#1146 during the community call brought up the possibility of enforcing the "See Specific Usage" convention more rigorously.
The server already emits a warning if descriptions with "See Specific Usage" aren't overridden in their specific usage.
The assertion is that enums with only the default "0"/"99" values defined in dictionary.json should have "See Specific Usage" in their description.
So an additional check should be added to ensure non-specific enums have this string in their description.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: