Minutes of 2025-10-01 Meeting #527 #2128
Closed
HeikoTheissen
announced in
Minutes
Replies: 1 comment
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Roll call [8:00]
Meeting link: OASIS Open Data Protocol (OData) TC
Attendees:
Quorum is achieved (8 out of 9 voting members)
Approve agenda [8:05]
Agenda is approved.
Approve minutes from previous meeting(s) [8:10]
Minutes of 2025-09-24 Meeting #526.pdf
Minutes are approved.
Progression of Aggregation Extensions to CSD05 [8:15]
Heiko tables the following motion:
George and Hubert second. TC holds a
The motion passes.
Issues [9:00]
OData TC Github Issues
Consider adding railroad diagrams for the URL syntax #315
Diagrams need to change for
1*(...)
and*(...)
and1*3(...)
rules. Christoph will correct the PR ODATA-1379: Add syntax diagram generation tool and HTML output odata-abnf#131 accordingly. The HTML page with the railroad diagrams shall be published on GitHub Pages.Heiko promises a pull request that converts references to ABNF rules in the specification documents to hyperlinks to the HTML page.
Position of # in @type references #2127
TC agrees to resolve the issue as proposed by Ralf. Heiko will prepare a pull request.
Relative precedence of "restrictions specific to a path" odata-vocabularies#298
TC agrees on the proposed wording changes. Heiko will correct the base branch of PR Disallow conflicting restrictions for the same capability odata-vocabularies#304 and resubmit it for review.
Preference for Skipping Status Monitor Resource Creation #2126
New preference for fire-and-forget requests that return 202 Accepted with Preference-Applied but without Location header. They would then ignore respond-async and wait preferences.
Prefer: wait=0
cannot be used to express the same because Ling's service ignores this value. It is also unclear whether a server should cancel a create request after the preferred wait period is exceeded. A new preference would make the client's intent clear. Hubert will create a PR that defines one.Also, Hubert will create an issue suggesting a preference for a retention period for the result of an asynchronous request.
Next meetings [9:50]
AOB and wrap up [9:55]
Meeting is adjourned.
Find these minutes also at Minutes of 2025-10-01 Meeting #527 #2128.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions