The current stix2.1 schemas appear to predate several vocabulary additions reflected in STIX 2.1 Errata 01. This may be intentional version skew, but these are the differences observed against the Errata 01 detail tables.
Could these vocabularies be aligned with the Errata 01 detail tables, or is the difference intentional for this branch?
Specification reference: STIX Version 2.1 Errata 01, §§10.9, 10.11, 10.12, 10.22, and 10.23.
The current
stix2.1schemas appear to predate several vocabulary additions reflected in STIX 2.1 Errata 01. This may be intentional version skew, but these are the differences observed against the Errata 01 detail tables.schemas/sdos/identity.json,industry-sector-ovdoes not contain"legal"(STIX §10.11) and contains"engineering", which is not listed in that detail table.schemas/sdos/malware.json,implementation-language-ovdoes not contain"rust"(STIX §10.9).schemas/sdos/infrastructure.json,infrastructure-type-ovdoes not contain"control-system","firewall","routers-switches", or"workstation"(STIX §10.12).schemas/sdos/report.json,report-type-ovdoes not contain"incident"or"intrusion-set"(STIX §10.22).schemas/sdos/threat-actor.json,threat-actor-type-ovdoes not contain"private-sector"(STIX §10.23).Could these vocabularies be aligned with the Errata 01 detail tables, or is the difference intentional for this branch?
Specification reference: STIX Version 2.1 Errata 01, §§10.9, 10.11, 10.12, 10.22, and 10.23.