-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.4k
@nodejs/nodejs-website contribution requirements #7767
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
FYI I've requested @avivkeller to open this issue on my behalf. I do feel the 6m could be debatable to up to 1y. |
I think it would be kinder if an attempt is made to contact the individual privately first (e.g. Slack/Twitter DM etc) where possible as an initial step |
My only concern is that we don't have a shared discussion forum internal to the website teams, so I don't think we wouldn't be able to automate the flagging of inactive users. However, if we get the OpenJS Foundation to add a |
I’m in favor we can also use this PR as a guide to create the inactivity policy |
Okay, since we are generally in favor this, I'll open a PR updating our guidelines and adding an automation. As mentioned on Slack, we may not need a private channel for discussions, individuals can reach out to maintainers (Brian and Claudio) with private concerns |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The @nodejs/nodejs-website team currently includes 18 members. However, it's clear that some of these members are no longer actively contributing. To keep the team focused and efficient, I propose adopting contribution requirements similar to those used by the Node.js core team.
To remain a member of the @nodejs/nodejs-website team, collaborators must meet the following activity requirement:
If a collaborator does not meet this requirement, an automated process will open an issue, prompting the @nodejs/nodejs-website team to review and discuss whether the individual should be removed from the team.
If a member is removed, they must be re-nominated to rejoin the @nodejs/nodejs-website team.
While the specific implementation of said policy can be subject to change, I'd appreciate a 👍 👎 on whether you like this idea (since it may affect all of us)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: