Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update criteria too restrictive #38

Open
ryantm opened this issue Apr 2, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Update criteria too restrictive #38

ryantm opened this issue Apr 2, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@ryantm
Copy link
Collaborator

ryantm commented Apr 2, 2018

  1. It wants to see the old version repology says nixpkgs-unstable is at to do an update, so it won't update in the case where someone else has updated the expression on master to a version between the OLD and NEW versions.
  2. It wants no branch to exist for updating the package, so it won't do an update if there is a pending PR updating to a version between the OLD and NEW versions.
@layus
Copy link

layus commented Nov 18, 2018

  1. could be worked around, because you can reproduce repology version detection locally. Run it for the current package, and use that instead of repology info maybe ?

@sedlund
Copy link
Contributor

sedlund commented Jan 6, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants