Use analyze-project from ni/python-actions

[dixonjoel]

• This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

Re-use the analyze-project action from python-actions repo.

Why should this Pull Request be merged?

Standard analysis of a Python package.

What testing has been done?

PR

[dixonjoel]

@bkeryan I think we could update check_examples to use analyze-project. It would be trickier since we enumerate them and check them, but I don't see any major hurdles. Do you think that's something we want to do?

[bkeryan]

@bkeryan I think we could update check_examples to use analyze-project. It would be trickier since we enumerate them and check them, but I don't see any major hurdles. Do you think that's something we want to do?

Sure, you can use a matrix like in ni-apis-python.

[github-actions]

Test Results

    52 files  ±0      52 suites  ±0   1h 17m 5s ⏱️ + 2m 57s
   689 tests ±0     689 ✅ ±0      0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
20 700 runs  ±0  19 644 ✅ ±0  1 056 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 0559607. ± Comparison against base commit 9192eab.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[dixonjoel]

@bkeryan FYI, adding 'checks_succeeded' and 'unit_tests_succeeded' as summary steps to reduce the required checks.

[bkeryan]

@bkeryan FYI, adding 'checks_succeeded' and 'unit_tests_succeeded' as summary steps to reduce the required checks.

For tests, use "Test Results", provided by https://github.com/EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action