You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you very much for providing the paper and code regarding to PINO. I noticed in your paper that data and physical information can be sampled at different resolutions, and that physical information can be sampled at a higher resolution. However, in the train_2d file in the code, the train_2d_operator, data loss (myloss) and PDE loss (darcy_loss) both use the same pred, which may cause them to use the same grid precision. It may be necessary to redefine the pred used in darcy_loss.
Additionally, x and y are not directly given in the code, and I assume they need to be replaced with data_ic and u.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you very much for providing the paper and code regarding to PINO. I noticed in your paper that data and physical information can be sampled at different resolutions, and that physical information can be sampled at a higher resolution. However, in the train_2d file in the code, the train_2d_operator, data loss (myloss) and PDE loss (darcy_loss) both use the same pred, which may cause them to use the same grid precision. It may be necessary to redefine the pred used in darcy_loss.
Additionally, x and y are not directly given in the code, and I assume they need to be replaced with data_ic and u.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: