Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Minor]: Missing PDDL3.1 section in table #17

Open
OfficiallySomeGuy opened this issue Feb 6, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

[Minor]: Missing PDDL3.1 section in table #17

OfficiallySomeGuy opened this issue Feb 6, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
Correction Anything that is factually incorrect PDDL Anything to do with PDDL Typo or Rephrasing Anything that is not factually inaccurate but could benefit from rewriting

Comments

@OfficiallySomeGuy
Copy link
Collaborator

Link to page(s) with issue: https://github.com/nergmada/pddl-reference/blob/master/docs/reference/planners/OPTIC/main.md

Quote of current error: Missing PDDL3.1 section of table, adding (:action-costs), officially part of IPC 6 and 7. Ironically the thing that OPTIC adds over POPF.

Proposed correction: Add PDDL3.1 section of table

@OfficiallySomeGuy OfficiallySomeGuy added the Typo or Rephrasing Anything that is not factually inaccurate but could benefit from rewriting label Feb 6, 2019
@OfficiallySomeGuy OfficiallySomeGuy changed the title [Minor]: [Minor]: Missing PDDL3.1 section in table Feb 6, 2019
@nergmada nergmada added Correction Anything that is factually incorrect PDDL Anything to do with PDDL labels Feb 6, 2019
@nergmada
Copy link
Owner

nergmada commented Feb 6, 2019

I've just discovered this in the IPC domains as well

@nergmada
Copy link
Owner

nergmada commented Mar 7, 2019

PDDL3.1 seems to be a version of PDDL which snuck in via the back door, have you got a link to a paper published on PDDL3.1

@nvitucci
Copy link

Just found this and had the same question. It looks like there is some reference here (and more specifically here).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Correction Anything that is factually incorrect PDDL Anything to do with PDDL Typo or Rephrasing Anything that is not factually inaccurate but could benefit from rewriting
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants