Skip to content

Bring back dprime as a legitimate goal parameter? #93

@hneth

Description

@hneth

When creating FFTs, FFTrees determines cue thresholds and selects and combines cues based on the goal.threshold, goal.chase and goal parameters.

Although this worked in an earlier version and dprime is still noted as a goal_valid when creating FFTs, actually using it (as any of the goal parameters) currently fails.
As some colleagues favor it as the measure to maximize, a first question is:

  1. Should we bring back dprime as a legitimate measure to maximize?

Reflecting on this, I see two related questions:

  1. As I'm not sure whether the $z$-transformation required to compute dprime makes sense for typical datasets, we could simply maximize the difference of hit rate minus false alarm rate (aka. "column power" or
    $\Delta P_c = \text{sens} - (1 - \text{spec})$, see Table 3 of 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567817 for details).

This immediately raises the question:

  1. Is there an analog measure in the orthogonal "prediction direction" that maximizes
    the difference between $\text{ppv}$ and $1 - \text{npv}$? The answer is yes, of course:
    $\Delta P_r = \text{ppv} - (1 - \text{npv})$?

Hence, I wonder:

  • Has anyone systematically compared the results of those measures with each other?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions