A publication-quality dual-panel log-log visualization comparing neural efficiency scaling in biology with compute efficiency scaling in technology.
Open output/energetic_scaling_interactive.html in your browser for an interactive version with hover tooltips.
- Neurons per kg vs. body mass reveals clade-specific scaling rules
- Humans are outliers: 86B neurons, Encephalization Quotient (EQ) ~7
- Birds achieve remarkable density (Goldcrest: 3.6×10¹⁰ neurons/kg)
- Reptiles have ~20x fewer neurons than endotherms at same body size
- Power-law slopes differ: mammals ~-0.3, primates flatter (linear scaling)
- Compute per dollar has increased ~75 quadrillion-fold (1939–2024)
- Exponential trend continues: ~2x improvement per year
- AI scaling explosion post-2012 (AlexNet → GPT-4 → Grok-4)
- Training FLOPs grew from 10¹⁷ (AlexNet) to 10²⁶+ (frontier 2026)
Both panels reveal power laws (straight lines on log-log plots):
- Biology: Energy budget constrains neural investment; humans broke the curve
- Technology: Economic/physical limits drive exponential improvement; AI is the new outlier
| Domain | Scaling Rule | Outlier |
|---|---|---|
| Biology | Neurons/kg ~ Mass^(-0.3) | Human (EQ~7) |
| Tech | cps/$ ~ 2^(year/1.5) | AI FLOPs explosion |
- Neuronal scaling: Herculano-Houzel et al. (comparative neuroanatomy)
- Metabolic scaling: Kleiber's Law (0.75 exponent)
- Life History Theory: Kaplan, Charnov (Ache/Tsimane forager data)
- Tech price-performance: Kurzweil (2024 update), NVIDIA specs
- AI FLOPs: Epoch AI, scaling reports
pip install matplotlib numpy scipy plotlycd src && python energetic_scaling.pycd src && python energetic_scaling_plotly.pyenergetic-scaling/
├── README.md
├── data/
│ └── scaling_data.csv
├── src/
│ ├── energetic_scaling.py
│ └── energetic_scaling_plotly.py
└── output/
├── energetic_scaling_highres.png
├── energetic_scaling.svg
└── energetic_scaling_interactive.html
- AI Compute Timeline – Training FLOPs growth over time
- Adoption Timeline – Time to mass adoption compression
Together, these three plots show:
- Compute growth (AI Timeline) → enables scale
- Adoption compression (Adoption Timeline) → accelerates deployment
- Efficiency scaling (this plot) → fundamental limits and outliers
MIT
