You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the provided code snippet below, there exists a potential Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability stemming from the unsafe use of the eval() function. The code checks if the target_url variable starts with the string "func". If true, it extracts the substring after "func:" and performs a replacement operation to substitute "last_url" with the page.url value. Subsequently, this processed string is passed to the eval() function for execution.
Security Impact:
This vulnerability allows attackers to bypass normal security mechanisms and execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the user running the vulnerable application. This could lead to severe consequences, including data theft, service disruption, or the installation of malicious software.
What did you expect to happen?
To mitigate this vulnerability, avoid using eval() with untrusted inputs. Instead, consider implementing a safer alternative, such as a whitelist of allowed functions or a more secure parsing and execution mechanism. Additionally, perform thorough input validation and sanitization to prevent malicious inputs from being processed.
How can we reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
Any additional info you think would be helpful for fixing this bug
To mitigate this vulnerability, avoid using eval() with untrusted inputs. Instead, consider implementing a safer alternative, such as a whitelist of allowed functions or a more secure parsing and execution mechanism. Additionally, perform thorough input validation and sanitization to prevent malicious inputs from being processed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What happened?
Description
In the provided code snippet below, there exists a potential Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability stemming from the unsafe use of the eval() function. The code checks if the target_url variable starts with the string "func". If true, it extracts the substring after "func:" and performs a replacement operation to substitute "last_url" with the page.url value. Subsequently, this processed string is passed to the eval() function for execution.
If we create a config as below:
So user's sensitive files will be deleted.
The code is from latest main branch :
https://github.com/microsoft/autogen/blob/main/python/packages/agbench/benchmarks/WebArena/Templates/Common/evaluation_harness/evaluators.py#L276
Such issue is belongs to CWE-94
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html
Security Impact:
This vulnerability allows attackers to bypass normal security mechanisms and execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the user running the vulnerable application. This could lead to severe consequences, including data theft, service disruption, or the installation of malicious software.
What did you expect to happen?
To mitigate this vulnerability, avoid using eval() with untrusted inputs. Instead, consider implementing a safer alternative, such as a whitelist of allowed functions or a more secure parsing and execution mechanism. Additionally, perform thorough input validation and sanitization to prevent malicious inputs from being processed.
How can we reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?
create a config as below:
So user's sensitive files will be deleted.
AutoGen version
latest main branch today
Which package was this bug in
Core
Model used
No response
Python version
No response
Operating system
No response
Any additional info you think would be helpful for fixing this bug
To mitigate this vulnerability, avoid using eval() with untrusted inputs. Instead, consider implementing a safer alternative, such as a whitelist of allowed functions or a more secure parsing and execution mechanism. Additionally, perform thorough input validation and sanitization to prevent malicious inputs from being processed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: