You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm checking JPA layer of FTGO application.
Could you please help me to clarify information on that.
In a number of previously seen applications I've encountered intensive usage of @onetomany, @manytoone, @manytomany (also with some following troubles and JPA Exceptions with Cascading problems on saving, especially for @manytomany).
Why there is this difference in annotation usage? Maybe, because @OneToMany/@ManyToOne/@manytomany are used on related Entities - and in FTGO there is a concept of Aggregate introduced (central Entity with surrounding Value objects)?
Is it possible situation in FTGO when you have to use @OneToMany/@ManyToOne/@manytomany as well? Or FTGO JPA layer can live and work with @Embedded annotation only?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Chris,
I'm checking JPA layer of FTGO application.
Could you please help me to clarify information on that.
In a number of previously seen applications I've encountered intensive usage of @onetomany, @manytoone, @manytomany (also with some following troubles and JPA Exceptions with Cascading problems on saving, especially for @manytomany).
In FTGO there are only:
Questions are:
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: