You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If a timeseries is not yet present in LARD, two threads separately ingesting data for that timeseries can create two different timeseries IDs. Discovered from #46.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On the MET labels? In principle, that's what makes the most sense to me, but can we have a deactivated and an active timeseries sharing the same label? Also, this would disallow the current approach we have taken with migrations and ts reconciliation?
Edit: another problem is that some param codes don't have an associated param id, so it might not work for those. I'm still not sure how to handle them properly.
I meant only on the native labels (i.e labels.obsinn). We need duplicates on the met label for the reconciliation strategy, but each of those should have different native labels
If a timeseries is not yet present in LARD, two threads separately ingesting data for that timeseries can create two different timeseries IDs. Discovered from #46.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: