Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Simper user interface for operation, workflow driven. #30

Open
riban-bw opened this issue Mar 6, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@riban-bw
Copy link

riban-bw commented Mar 6, 2020

The user interface provides access to operational and configuration elements. Some user workflows require access to both. This can be confusing for operators. It would be good to have simplified user interface option and / or hide all configuration behind one button.

Most significantly, the selection of sources, particularly AoIP streams should be available to the operator more easily. It shouldn't necessarily be part of the configuration settings and should be part of the user workflow. Maybe configuration settings could allow each source to be enabled and then a separate user workflow based selection of input be provided.

The current workflow to select AoIP source is:

  • Select the view, e.g. Screens->Meters
  • Touch unused part of screen to show menu buttons
  • Select "Settings"
  • Select AoIP (may already be selected)
  • Select AoIP stream
  • Select "Screens"

This is a lot of touches (4) to swap between sources. The user must switch context between view selection and settings adjustment which isn't intuitive.

@martim01
Copy link
Owner

martim01 commented Mar 6, 2020

Latest code has press "AoIP" button on bottom right to bring up screen of AoIP sources. Selecting one will return to previous screen

@martim01
Copy link
Owner

martim01 commented Mar 6, 2020

Like the idea of filtering the list in the Settings before presenting to the new screen. I'll have a think about how to do that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants