You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am aware, that marq24 is a grumpy old guy, so it can happen that my issue will be closed instantly when essential information is missing (e.g. no debug logs provided, no issue description, no steps to reproduce the issue, etc...).
I know, that any attachment send via eMail reply to a github issue notifications will be ignored and deleted by github automatically. With other words this will not work!
I confirm, that I do not have any other fordpass integration installed/configured (please also check deactivated configurations)
My home assistant version is up to date.
I am using the latest version of the integration | See the release list @github or in home assistant use the HACS 'Update Information' function to ensure that the latest released version of the integration is installed. This HACS function can be accessed via the 3-dot menu on the right side for each integration in the HACS integration list.
I have prepared DEBUG log output | In most of the cases of a technical error/issue or if you miss data, I would have the need to ask for DEBUG log output of the integration. There is a short tutorial/guide 'How to provide DEBUG log' here. If no debug log is provided, the issue will be closed instantly.
I confirm it's really an issue | In the case that you want to understand the functionality of a certain feature/sensor Please be so kind and make use if the discussion feature of this repo (and do not create an issue) - TIA
I confirm, that I did not read any of the previous bulletin-points and just checked them all. | I don't wanted to waste my time with details, I don't read or follow any existing instructions. | Instead, I want that the maintainer of this repo will spend time explaining the world to me — that's marq24's job!. | I live by the motto: Better to ask twice, than to think about it once. | It's marq24's own fault that he provides open-source software and is willing to offer free support.
Add a description
Small aside: nice checklist, by the way.
Description
The README lists Diesel Exhaust Fluid (AdBlue) level as a supported data point. The vehicle's vehicleCapabilities payload also reports dieselExhaustFluid: Display, indicating the Ford backend considers this data available for this vehicle. However, no sensor exposing the AdBlue/DEF fluid level (percentage or range) is created by the integration.
Vehicle
Model: Ford Transit (2019), 2025 model year, diesel (ICE)
dieselExhaustFilterStatus (value: NORMAL_OPERATION) — DPF status, not fluid level
dieselParticulateFilterSootLevel (value: 0) — soot level, not AdBlue
No dieselExhaustFluidLevel (or similarly named) key present anywhere in the metrics payload
sensor.fordpass_xxx_dieselsystemstatus only exposes a status string (NORMAL_OPERATION), no percentage/level attribute
Question
Since the README lists this as supported and the capability flag is Display, is the raw fluid-level value simply missing from the current backend response for this vehicle/region, or is it present in the raw payload but not yet mapped into a sensor/attribute by the integration?
Checklist
Add a description
Small aside: nice checklist, by the way.
Description
The README lists Diesel Exhaust Fluid (AdBlue) level as a supported data point. The vehicle's
vehicleCapabilitiespayload also reportsdieselExhaustFluid: Display, indicating the Ford backend considers this data available for this vehicle. However, no sensor exposing the AdBlue/DEF fluid level (percentage or range) is created by the integration.Vehicle
What I checked
sensor.fordpass_xxx_vehicles→vehicleCapabilities[0].dieselExhaustFluid=Displaysensor.fordpass_xxx_metrics(raw metrics blob) contains:dieselExhaustFilterStatus(value: NORMAL_OPERATION) — DPF status, not fluid leveldieselParticulateFilterSootLevel(value: 0) — soot level, not AdBluedieselExhaustFluidLevel(or similarly named) key present anywhere in the metrics payloadsensor.fordpass_xxx_dieselsystemstatusonly exposes a status string (NORMAL_OPERATION), no percentage/level attributeQuestion
Since the README lists this as supported and the capability flag is
Display, is the raw fluid-level value simply missing from the current backend response for this vehicle/region, or is it present in the raw payload but not yet mapped into a sensor/attribute by the integration?home-assistant_fordpass_2026-07-27T12-34-57.440Z.log
Add your DEBUG log output