Replies: 6 comments
|
Are you talking about tabs within the workspaces? |
|
Yes :) essentially tabs within a workspace. |
|
This is the single biggest feature that keeps me going back to Currently, I want full pane tabs under each workspaces to be able to keep dev servers running in 1 tab and 2nd tab onwards can be the agents CLIs. |
|
It would be really nice to have this working like ghostty does: each tab can have splits, rather than each split can have tabs |
|
I think this PR is aiming for the same goal: |
|
+1 on this, with a specific angle on the sidebar UX. Right now the sidebar shows workspaces as vertical tabs, but the surfaces/tabs open inside a workspace are only visible as the horizontal tab bar of the currently active workspace. So if I have several workspaces each holding a few tabs, I can only ever see the tabs of the one I'm focused on. What I'd love is for the sidebar to expand each workspace into a tree, listing its tabs (by name) nested underneath it — so I can see and jump to any tab in any workspace without switching workspaces first. Concretely: This lines up with what @shivangg described (full pane tabs under each workspace) and would pair really well with the tabs-within-a-workspace model from the original post and #1437. Even an opt-in |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
A useful addition to cmux would be tabs inside each workspace. Instead of a workspace having only one window, tabs would let you switch between multiple views within the same workspace. For example, one tab could be a single fullscreen terminal for focused work, another could contain several split terminals for multitasking (each with multiple tabs), and a third could be used for an integrated browser or reference view. This would make workspaces much more flexible by letting users organize different contexts without creating entirely separate workspaces.
All reactions