Skip to content

MVP: Draft human review and scoring validation protocol #2

Description

@alp-topcu

Goal

Define how anonymized records are reviewed and how scoring claims become trustworthy.

Acceptance criteria

  • Reviewer responsibilities and prohibited access are documented.
  • Calibration and disagreement workflows are described.
  • Validation plan defines metrics before claims are made.
  • Protocol separates draft research tooling from validated findings.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions