You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: 10.cross-species_comparison/README.md
+7-4Lines changed: 7 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1
1
2
2
# How to run
3
3
4
-
### Pre-process and integrate zebrafish datasets
4
+
##*Pre-process and integrate zebrafish datasets
5
5
6
6
> The zebrafish datasets were collectted from [Farnsworth et al.](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012160619304919), [Qian et al.](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00018-022-04410-2) and [Gillotay et al.](https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/embr.202050612).
7
7
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ $ Rscript zebrafish.subset.R
19
19
20
20
this will generate the final zebrafish dataset which shall be used in our comparison analysis, including files `zebrafish.final.rds` and `zebrafish.final.loom`
21
21
22
-
### SAMap comparison for thyroid like cell and hair cell-like cell
22
+
23
+
## *SAMap comparison for thyroid like cell and hair cell-like cell
23
24
24
25
**step 1:***pseudo-metacell* aggregation and data subsetting
As the result of cross-species comparison largely depend on quality of the dataset we can access, it is necessary to perform with reasonalble filteration process.
82
86
83
87
In our case, both the zebrafish thyroid data and cochlea data somewhat co-embedded with nervous and immune cells from the zebrafish developmental dataset, as shown in below figure, which might caused by residual sampling.
84
-
85
88

86
89
87
90
So we use diverse filtering criteria for different purpose to avoid this problem. And the final used cell groups in each task was labeled in their code or description seperately.
0 commit comments