Skip to content

Commit 527bd01

Browse files
committed
edit description
1 parent 39b1c01 commit 527bd01

3 files changed

Lines changed: 10 additions & 5 deletions

File tree

05.hotspot/README.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
44
**step 1:** extract stereo-seq data as h5ad file named 'Styela_clava.stereo.h5ad'
55
> The h5ad data have been deposited at CNGBdb (https://db.cngb.org/) under the accession number CNP0004228
66
7-
87
**step 2:** run the following code which will read in previous h5ad file
98
```shell
109
$ python3 performHotspot.py
1110
```
11+
1212
> [!NOTE]
1313
> Only one slice was calculated in this code.

06.spearman_correlation/README.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
11

2+
# How to run
23

34
### step 1. reciprocal blast using S. clava and zebrafish protein sequences
45

@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ python3 correlation_estimation.py \
4647
-figname corr.single
4748
```
4849
![Alt text](./img/corr_single.png)
50+
4951
- for one-to-many version correlation
5052
```shell
5153
python3 correlation_estimation.py \

10.cross-species_comparison/README.md

Lines changed: 7 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
11

22
# How to run
33

4-
### Pre-process and integrate zebrafish datasets
4+
## *Pre-process and integrate zebrafish datasets
55

66
> The zebrafish datasets were collectted from [Farnsworth et al.](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012160619304919), [Qian et al.](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00018-022-04410-2) and [Gillotay et al.](https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/embr.202050612).
77
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ $ Rscript zebrafish.subset.R
1919

2020
this will generate the final zebrafish dataset which shall be used in our comparison analysis, including files `zebrafish.final.rds` and `zebrafish.final.loom`
2121

22-
### SAMap comparison for thyroid like cell and hair cell-like cell
22+
23+
## *SAMap comparison for thyroid like cell and hair cell-like cell
2324

2425
**step 1:** *pseudo-metacell* aggregation and data subsetting
2526

@@ -71,17 +72,19 @@ $ awk -F '\t' 'BEGIN{print "source\ttarget\tValue"}{if(NR==1){source=$2}else{pri
7172
$ Rscript sankeyPlot.R -i TLC.for_plot.txt
7273
```
7374
![TLC sankey](./img/TLC.sankey.png)
75+
7476
- for HCLC cells
7577
```shell
7678
$ Rscript sankeyPlot.R -i HCLC.for_plot.txt
7779
```
7880
![HCLC sankey](./img/HCLC.sankey.png)
79-
### Additional intepretion
81+
82+
83+
## *Additional intepretion
8084

8185
As the result of cross-species comparison largely depend on quality of the dataset we can access, it is necessary to perform with reasonalble filteration process.
8286

8387
In our case, both the zebrafish thyroid data and cochlea data somewhat co-embedded with nervous and immune cells from the zebrafish developmental dataset, as shown in below figure, which might caused by residual sampling.
84-
8588
![splitted umap for thyroid and cochlea cell types](./img/umap.split.png)
8689

8790
So we use diverse filtering criteria for different purpose to avoid this problem. And the final used cell groups in each task was labeled in their code or description seperately.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)