You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am confused as to why after increasing the 5' clipping penalty, I do not see an alignment with no 5' clipping promoted to be the primary, and in fact, it disappears.
So the 5' clipping is turned up to 1000, so I would expect that we get the 103S48M alignment since it has no 5' soft-clipping (sequencing order), but instead we get a strange 27S85M33I3M3D3M alignment.
The latter says it has score 78, which makes no sense:
I am confused as to why after increasing the
5'
clipping penalty, I do not see an alignment with no5'
clipping promoted to be the primary, and in fact, it disappears.So the
5'
clipping is turned up to 1000, so I would expect that we get the103S48M
alignment since it has no5'
soft-clipping (sequencing order), but instead we get a strange27S85M33I3M3D3M
alignment.The latter says it has score
78
, which makes no sense:unless you look back on the original alignment
27S78M46S
where the soft-clips are not penalized (78M
score).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: