Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Repo License #14

Open
cakiki opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 9 comments
Open

Repo License #14

cakiki opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 9 comments

Comments

@cakiki
Copy link

cakiki commented Jun 28, 2023

Hello, I would like to reuse a fork of this repo in a project and was wondering what license this is released under, if any.

@leighmcculloch
Copy link
Owner

It doesn't have a license. Unfortunately I didn't include a license, and since multiple people have contributed since then, I believe I would need to request permission from all contributors to add a license. I guess we can try and do that though, no harm in trying.

@cakiki
Copy link
Author

cakiki commented Jul 4, 2023

Thank you! What license would you like to go for, in case the contributors are in agreement?

Also cc'ing people who I found in the closed PRs tab to see whether they'd be okay with licensing their contributions:

(Also cc'ing @e3b0c442 whose fork I was referring to in my original message 😃 )

@adsouza
Copy link
Contributor

adsouza commented Jul 4, 2023

Fine with me.

@leighmcculloch
Copy link
Owner

I suggest we apply MIT.

@e3b0c442
Copy link

e3b0c442 commented Jul 4, 2023

re: the fork, this is a bit hairy legal-wise because I never actually ended up using any of the original code or data that @leighmcculloch and contributors compiled, as can be seen in e3b0c442@74adb73; I think doing so was my original intent in making the fork, but then I got myself down a caffeine-fueled rabbit hole.

That said, I did start with a fork, I want to make sure @leighmcculloch is credited for the original idea, and I will happily comply with the upstream licensing decisions, but if I'm licensing my own work in isolation I would choose MIT for the code and CC-BY-4.0 for the compiled data.

Thanks for bringing this up, it's a good reminder to people like me that see cool things and want to build on them that we need to pay attention to licensing (or lack thereof).

@leighmcculloch
Copy link
Owner

@cakiki Maybe best to open an issue on @e3b0c442's fork requesting a license be added to it. Looks like the fork is more its own creation, and not a modification of this repo. I'm still happy to add an MIT license to this repo if the contributors all respond acknowledging such, but I don't think it solves your problem.

@trin94
Copy link
Contributor

trin94 commented Jul 4, 2023

MIT is fine for me 👍😄

@yene
Copy link
Contributor

yene commented Jul 4, 2023

Fine with me.

@kryskool
Copy link
Contributor

Ok for MIT licence

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants