Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3.0.0 enhancements #194

Open
cofyc opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

3.0.0 enhancements #194

cofyc opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Milestone

Comments

@cofyc
Copy link
Member

cofyc commented May 27, 2020

This is a track issue for the next major release 3.0.0. Backward incompatible changes can be made if they can simplify design, code implementation, or improve UX.

Proposals:

@cofyc cofyc added this to the 3.0.0 milestone May 27, 2020
@cofyc cofyc added the priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. label May 27, 2020
@cofyc cofyc pinned this issue Jun 12, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 26, 2020
@cofyc
Copy link
Member Author

cofyc commented Aug 26, 2020

/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Aug 26, 2020
@arianvp
Copy link
Contributor

arianvp commented Apr 21, 2021

I was wondering if anybody has made any progress yet on the local cloud controller? It would be a great feature to have to not have to delete PVs manually when nodes get replaced

@cdenneen
Copy link

@cofyc any further progress on 3.0.0?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants