-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New feature idea:Benchmarker
#247
Comments
/kind feature |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
/triage accepted |
This issue has not been updated in over 1 year, and should be re-triaged. You can:
For more details on the triage process, see https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/guide/issue-triage/ /remove-triage accepted |
I propose a new feature
benchmarker
idea based on MetricsCollector #246.In the proposal of the collector, the only responsibility was to collect metrics. This is to provide a way to access metrics not only from scenarios but also from general tools.
Therefore, the Benchmarker aims to make benchmark tests easily executable by having the
Scenario
and theCollector
work together.It would be nice if it could also work well with KEP-184:scheduler-simulation.
Relates: #167
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: