Resubmission of slot49 (PATH_4 case τ ≤ 8)
THIS IS THE BEST RESUBMISSION CANDIDATE
Almost everything is proven - just the final assembly remains!
Background
Aristotle previously failed to find a proof but NO counterexample was found.
Proven Lemmas (from Aristotle - extensive!)
tau_union_le_sum
tau_S_le_2 (200+ line proof!)
tau_X_le_2 (100+ line proof)
path4_A_bridges_only_to_B
path4_triangle_partition
tau_Te_le_4_for_endpoint
Target
tau_le_8_path4: For path A—B—C—D, τ(G) ≤ 8
Mathematical Insight
In path A—B—C—D:
- τ(S_A) ≤ 2, τ(S_B) ≤ 2, τ(S_C) ≤ 2, τ(S_D) ≤ 2
- Bridges X_{A,B}, X_{B,C}, X_{C,D} are covered by adjacent S covers
- Key: Bridges are SHARED between adjacent S covers
Proof Strategy
S_A ∪ S_B ∪ S_C ∪ S_D covers all triangles because:
- bridges_{e} share vertex v with neighbor f
- So covered by S_f structure
Remaining Sorry
tau_le_8_path4: Final assembly showing 8 edges suffice
File
submissions/nu4_final/slot257_path4_tau_le_8_RESUB.lean
Aristotle Submission
Resubmission of slot49 (PATH_4 case τ ≤ 8)
THIS IS THE BEST RESUBMISSION CANDIDATE
Almost everything is proven - just the final assembly remains!
Background
Aristotle previously failed to find a proof but NO counterexample was found.
Proven Lemmas (from Aristotle - extensive!)
tau_union_le_sumtau_S_le_2(200+ line proof!)tau_X_le_2(100+ line proof)path4_A_bridges_only_to_Bpath4_triangle_partitiontau_Te_le_4_for_endpointTarget
tau_le_8_path4: For path A—B—C—D, τ(G) ≤ 8Mathematical Insight
In path A—B—C—D:
Proof Strategy
S_A ∪ S_B ∪ S_C ∪ S_D covers all triangles because:
Remaining Sorry
tau_le_8_path4: Final assembly showing 8 edges sufficeFile
submissions/nu4_final/slot257_path4_tau_le_8_RESUB.leanAristotle Submission