We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
curry' in
op.py: def curry(f, arg, *rest):
Is it more appropriate to call it uncurry?
uncurry
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sure, you're right. Firstly this function was declared for this point in road-map:
Curried function builder to simplify lambda arg1: lambda arg2:
lambda arg1: lambda arg2:
I'll fix curry/uncurry inconsistency when work on fn.op enhancements. Thanks for reminder!
curry
fn.op
Sorry, something went wrong.
Provide link to "Union-based heaps" slides (KyivPy #11)
a854dae
Merge pull request kachayev#11 from cad106uk/master
5548d89
bug fix for curried wrapper
kachayev
No branches or pull requests
op.py: def curry(f, arg, *rest):
Is it more appropriate to call it
uncurry
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: