Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible ambiguous syntax #40

Open
avidrucker opened this issue Jun 24, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Possible ambiguous syntax #40

avidrucker opened this issue Jun 24, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@avidrucker
Copy link

avidrucker commented Jun 24, 2021

The second question ("tab #1") in Chapter 4 has two ellipses in the starting code. How are we to know which if either or both are "fill in the blanks" versus "syntax that we are to leave be"? After viewing the answer, I see what was expected of me, but could this be made clearer by having a "strict" blank that doesn't look like valid syntax?

Suggestion 1: For example, in the Clojure Koans, they use the double underscore "__" as their "blanks" to fill in.
Suggestion 2: Add an annotation or hint that helps the learner know that they are only to touch X line(s) for a given problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant