You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems like the exponential decay referred throughout and most likely used by library users is exponential growth rather exponential decay
Exponential decay has a negative exponent.
It would be nice to have a separation for the sake of correctness
That aside, would it not be nice for the exponential stuff to have constants associated with them? or is that beyond the scope of the project?
P.S As a matter of fact, none of the predefined decay functions are actually decaying, all of them are growth functions (double,exponential and golden-ratio)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems like the
exponential decay
referred throughout and most likely used by library users isexponential growth
ratherexponential decay
Exponential decay has a negative exponent.
It would be nice to have a separation for the sake of correctness
That aside, would it not be nice for the exponential stuff to have constants associated with them? or is that beyond the scope of the project?
P.S As a matter of fact, none of the predefined
decay
functions are actually decaying, all of them are growth functions (double
,exponential
andgolden-ratio
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: