Initial 1password Feedback #10
Closed
andrewthauer
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
To address the last point. I wonder if the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Just tried out
fnoxwith 1password and seems to work nicely. Though I noticed a few things:I did not need to set
OP_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKENor create a service account. In fact, I'm perfectly fine with this since setting up and managing service accounts when you haveopCLI setup is unnecessary. I do see warnings aboutOP_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKENnot being set though.The
provider.vaultkey is required for type 1password even when usingop://secrets references. Though, I was also able to just set a dummy value and resolve secrets from different vaults within the same account as per the provider. Perhapsvaultshould be optional as well?It looks like
fnoxwill resolve every item one by one by forking out toop read. Another approach is piping secrets references toop injectto resolve a batch of secrets references in one call vs one by one. Having core support for batching secret resolution across providers would be ideal to improve the performance and efficiency of resolving external secrets.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions