-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy paththesis.out
39 lines (39 loc) · 2.6 KB
/
thesis.out
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{chapter*.7}{Introduction}{}% 1
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section*.8}{Part 1}{chapter*.7}% 2
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section*.9}{Part 2}{chapter*.7}% 3
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{chapter.1}{Chapter 1: RCV Background}{}% 4
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.1.1}{What is ranked choice voting?}{chapter.1}% 5
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.1.2}{Frequently Used Terms}{chapter.1}% 6
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.1.3}{Claims about RCV}{chapter.1}% 7
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.1.4}{History of RCV in the US}{chapter.1}% 8
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.1.5}{Why, or why not, implement RCV?}{chapter.1}% 9
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.1.6}{Research into San Francisco}{chapter.1}% 10
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{chapter.2}{Chapter 2: Data structure and demographic analysis methods}{}% 11
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.2.1}{Data Structure and Source}{chapter.2}% 12
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.2.2}{Data processing methods}{chapter.2}% 13
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.2.3}{Calculating overvote and undervote rates}{chapter.2}% 14
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.2.4}{Regressions}{chapter.2}% 15
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{chapter.3}{Chapter 3: Demographic analysis results}{}% 16
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.3.1}{Voter turnout}{chapter.3}% 17
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.3.2}{Overvoting}{chapter.3}% 18
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.3.3}{Undervoting}{chapter.3}% 19
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{chapter.4}{Chapter 4: Missing data literature review}{}% 20
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.4.1}{Missing data}{chapter.4}% 21
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.4.2}{Methods of dealing with missing data}{chapter.4}% 22
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.4.3}{What if everybody votes \(fully\)?}{chapter.4}% 23
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.4.4}{Peculiarities with this study}{chapter.4}% 24
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{chapter.5}{Chapter 5: Missing data methods}{}% 25
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.5.1}{Imputation}{chapter.5}% 26
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.5.2}{Data preparation}{chapter.5}% 27
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.5.3}{Metrics for comparing methods}{chapter.5}% 28
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{chapter.6}{Chapter 6: Data imputation results}{}% 29
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.6.1}{Final winner}{chapter.6}% 30
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.6.2}{London Breed's final vote share}{chapter.6}% 31
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.6.3}{Intermediate switches in rankings}{chapter.6}% 32
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.6.4}{Distribution of vote combinations}{chapter.6}% 33
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.6.5}{Exhausted voters by the final round}{chapter.6}% 34
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{chapter*.71}{Conclusion}{}% 35
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.6.6}{Summary of results}{chapter*.71}% 36
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.6.7}{Future research ideas}{chapter*.71}% 37
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{appendix.A}{Appendix A: Description of variables}{}% 38
\BOOKMARK [0][-]{appendix*.72}{References}{}% 39