Skip to content

Conversation

@bingyanglin
Copy link
Contributor

Description of change

  • Implemented SimulateTransaction and ExecuteTransaction in the gRPC API.

Links to any relevant issues

Fixes #9392 #9393

How the change has been tested

  • Basic tests (linting, compilation, formatting, unit/integration tests)
  • Patch-specific tests (correctness, functionality coverage)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have checked that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@bingyanglin bingyanglin self-assigned this Nov 26, 2025
@bingyanglin bingyanglin added the node Issues related to the Core Node team label Nov 26, 2025
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 26, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

6 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
apps-backend Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 4, 2025 3:51pm
apps-ui-kit Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 4, 2025 3:51pm
iota-evm-bridge Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 4, 2025 3:51pm
iota-multisig-toolkit Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 4, 2025 3:51pm
rebased-explorer Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 4, 2025 3:51pm
wallet-dashboard Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 4, 2025 3:51pm

@bingyanglin bingyanglin force-pushed the feat/grpc-transaction-execution-service branch from c6db839 to 0f079a9 Compare November 26, 2025 12:40
@bingyanglin bingyanglin marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2025 09:49
@bingyanglin bingyanglin requested review from a team as code owners November 27, 2025 09:49
Copy link
Contributor

@piotrm50 piotrm50 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approving the only owned file crates/iota-types/src/gas.rs

@muXxer muXxer force-pushed the feat/grpc-transaction-execution-service branch from 5c52a5c to be20c12 Compare December 4, 2025 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-protocol node Issues related to the Core Node team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants