You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Was there any particular design reason for not including a std_msgs/Header field in the Faces message that the openface_ros node publishes?
In order to sync the audio data with the visual data in a single ROS node, I was thinking of using the time synchronizer from the message_filters package with an approximate time policy. But doing so requires that the messages from both topics have a header field.
Would it be appropriate to include this field in the Faces message?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
briantam
changed the title
Header in "Faces" message?
Adding a Header field in "Faces" message?
Nov 17, 2016
Hi @bmcdorman, @eshort:
Was there any particular design reason for not including a
std_msgs/Header
field in the Faces message that theopenface_ros
node publishes?In order to sync the audio data with the visual data in a single ROS node, I was thinking of using the time synchronizer from the message_filters package with an approximate time policy. But doing so requires that the messages from both topics have a header field.
Would it be appropriate to include this field in the Faces message?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: