Skip to content

Conversation

@kszucs
Copy link
Member

@kszucs kszucs commented Nov 4, 2025

Depends on #3253

@kszucs kszucs force-pushed the remove-rowsindex-partial branch from 02564d9 to 52f5a81 Compare November 4, 2025 14:52
Copy link
Member

@lhoestq lhoestq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we need partial for create_response() no ?

@kszucs kszucs force-pushed the remove-rowsindex-partial branch from 52f5a81 to 1b79a16 Compare November 4, 2025 18:22
@kszucs
Copy link
Member Author

kszucs commented Nov 4, 2025

duckdb_index_is_partial() is only used in a unit test and ParquetIndexWithMetadata.partial is not used (at least within parquet_utils).

@kszucs kszucs force-pushed the remove-rowsindex-partial branch from 1b79a16 to 3c67982 Compare November 4, 2025 18:25
@kszucs kszucs changed the title refactor(libcommon): remove unused RowsIndex.partial and duckdb_index_is_partial() refactor(libcommon): remove unused duckdb_index_is_partial() Nov 4, 2025
@kszucs
Copy link
Member Author

kszucs commented Nov 4, 2025

I think we need partial for create_response() no ?

It is indeed required for the response, restored it.

@kszucs kszucs force-pushed the remove-rowsindex-partial branch from afbefe5 to 21599e4 Compare November 4, 2025 18:51
@kszucs kszucs requested a review from lhoestq November 5, 2025 08:11
@kszucs kszucs merged commit 00c8745 into main Nov 5, 2025
28 of 30 checks passed
@kszucs kszucs deleted the remove-rowsindex-partial branch November 5, 2025 11:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants