Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

confused about Psi_95CI #55

Open
QuanlongJiang opened this issue Apr 30, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

confused about Psi_95CI #55

QuanlongJiang opened this issue Apr 30, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@QuanlongJiang
Copy link

Dear author,

  1. I think the psi 95CI shuld be a invterval. but only a single value was provied in the result. Is Psi_95CI the upper bounds of 95 CI?
  2. you said " if a splicing event in a gene doesn’t have any read, it will return a posterior with Psi’s mean=0.5 and 95% confidence interval around 0.95 (most cases >0.9)" . I think PSI 0.5 means a half of exon was exclued. This is confused. Is that better if the PSI assigned as 1 if there is no reads?
  3. why Psi_95CI > 0.3 keep the confident psi?

Thanks a lot, I hope to hear from you.
quanlong Jiang

@huangyh09
Copy link
Owner

Hi, thanks for the questions.

  1. You are right, 95 CI refers to the lower and upper bound of 95% interval. Here, we compact it to a single value to denote the range (upper - lower bounds), as we aim to use for filtering.
  2. that's the impact of how we choose the prior. In BRIE2, it is recommended to use the average of the cell population as the mean of the prior (a logit-normal distribution). Nonetheless, one should keep an eye on the 95 CI to filter out those less confident quantifications.
  3. It should be Psi_95CI < 0.3 as confident psi. One can choose a more stringent cutoff, if they are more conservative or have very high coverage.

Yuanhua

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants