Can't intercept terminal with turborepo: Cannot find module '\path\..\js\prepend-node.js'

[ceifa]

When starting turborepo on a hooked terminal, I get this error:

node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1404
  throw err;
  ^

Error: Cannot find module '\path\..\js\prepend-node.js'
Require stack:
- internal/preload
    at Function._resolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1401:15)
    at mod._load (C:\Users\ceifa\AppData\Local\Programs\httptoolkit\resources\httptoolkit-server\
overrides\js\wrap-require.js:52:26)
    at TracingChannel.traceSync (node:diagnostics_channel:322:14)
    at wrapModuleLoad (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:235:24)
    at Module.require (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1487:12)
    at node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:2045:12
    at loadPreloadModules (node:internal/process/pre_execution:734:5)
    at setupUserModules (node:internal/process/pre_execution:206:5)
    at prepareExecution (node:internal/process/pre_execution:159:5)
    at prepareMainThreadExecution (node:internal/process/pre_execution:54:10) {
  code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND',
  requireStack: [ 'internal/preload' ]
}

Node.js v22.15.0
 ELIFECYCLE  Command failed with exit code 1.

[pimterry]

I don't know anything about turborepo I'm afraid.

I suspect in this case this is being caused by our PATH intercept for Node, which acts a fallback for NODE_OPTIONS in cases where that doesn't work (most commonly: in cases where users set their own NODE_OPTIONS).

If you run echo $PATH in another terminal to get your normal value, and then run export PATH=<normal value> in the intercepted terminal, do things start working as expected?

The implementation of this is here. What should happen is that this uses dirname "$0" to find the path to itself, then uses that to calculate the relative path to prepend-node.js, and injects that into the command line options. That dirname trick does depend on exactly how the script is called. I haven't seen issues with this before, but it is certainly possible there are cases where this doesn't work.

[pimterry]

Hi @ceifa, if you have a second, can you test the above to confirm this?