Differing entity namespace for some fields

[p14n]

With this schema:

^{:lacinia/tag-recursive true :datomic/tag-recursive true}
    Dentist [
       ^ID id
       ^Address primaryAddress
       ^Boolean doesImplants]

^{:lacinia/tag-recursive true :datomic/tag-recursive true}
    Doctor [
       ^ID id
       ^Address primaryAddress
       ^Boolean generalPractitioner]

a datomic schema will be generated containing :dentist/id, :dentist/primaryAddress, :doctor/id and :doctor/primaryAddress. It might make more sense to model this as :practitioner/id and :practioner/primaryAddress. Would you be open to a PR or do you see issues with this approach or a workaround?

Thanks for Hodur!

[madvas]

Any updates?