You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
An example (link) where both Solid Steel Ingot and Steel Ingot are used at the same time. However Solid Steel Ingot (2, 2 -> 3) strictly dominates Steel Ingot (3, 3 -> 3) in terms of raw resources, so it's weird that the solver decides to pick both at the same time (and then even route the outputs to the same nodes):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
that's most likely due to the known "bug", where maximise doesn't optimise for raw resources. Best way to go around this is to copy the number that you get and put it to the tool again with "items/min", then it'll be optimised for raw resources. New version that's in the works will do this automatically tho, so you'll have even maximise setups optimised for raw resources.
Just a note - may also be useful to add a checkbox "Only use one recipe per part" (and maybe even set it on by default) - it happens very often in both modes (maximize and items/min) - that it picks e.g. both Modular Frame and Steeled Frame etc. Realistically, you would pretty much always just pick one, even if there's 1% difference in performance.
An example (link) where both Solid Steel Ingot and Steel Ingot are used at the same time. However Solid Steel Ingot (2, 2 -> 3) strictly dominates Steel Ingot (3, 3 -> 3) in terms of raw resources, so it's weird that the solver decides to pick both at the same time (and then even route the outputs to the same nodes):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: