Wanna use bun install, not npm

[bitdom8]

Wanna use bun install, not npm. Is it feasible

[bitdom8]

@gornostay25

[maietta]

@gornostay25

Rude.

[pooledge]

@bitdom8 What are you trying to achieve?

[bitdom8]

Want to use bun i instead of npm i however the node_modules are still heavy, contrary to my assumption

[oSethoum]

@bitdom8 use pnpm dude

[bitdom8]

@oSethoum we reject the premise of this

[Antonio-Bennett]

@bitdom8 Bun now supports sveltekit with bun create in 0.8

[bitdom8]

@Antonio-Bennett great, thanks

[oSethoum]

@bitdom8 Bun now supports sveltekit with bun create in 0.8

does that mean we no longer need the adapter to run in production with bun?

[veneficium42]

@bitdom8 Bun now supports sveltekit with bun create in 0.8

does that mean we no longer need the adapter to run in production with bun?

Bun now has out of the box compatibility with svelte kit but that uses node packages, this plugin uses bun's serve instead, it should perform better I think

[kolchurinvv]

it's my understanding that adapters are essential to the way svelte kit builds for specific environments. more on that here. so my bet is that adapters will continue being necessary.
as to the original post. I think bun is a drop-in replacement for things like npm - which doesn't mean that the blackhole of node_modules is any smaller. it just means we don't need to develop a whole new ecosystem of packages (one of the biggest issues with deno). as per using bun install - it works. i've been using it since bun 0.5.x and it's working just fine with a caveat that bun is still not building the fornt-end. that's done via vite and esbuild under the hood. but using this adapter we can at least run built files using bun

[notramo]

@bitdom8, @gornostay25, it seems like this issue can be closed now. Bun supports creating and installing a SvelteKit project, and this repo doesn't mention npm anymore.