Addressing Antigravity Bans & Reinstating Access #20632
Replies: 45 comments 43 replies
-
|
W |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
They fear opencode and openclaw. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@anxkhn opencode (and other third party tools/proxies) maybe; openclaw is just a bunch of mcp servers in a trenchcoat. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
OpenClaw is also the primary source of slop and low quality submissions to GItHub, HN, and beyond |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I can't say for antigravity since its an closed source IDE but both gemini cli and opencode are OSS. I think if the cli team makes an agreement for an official integration in opencode like how its done with gh copilot and codex, that would be a massive W from google. They could still add some rules and exceptions like limits on subagent requests etc. to comply with the current server load. Ion give a sh about openclaw. if you're going to use it fully on a production level, you should not be eligible for subsidized benefits of subs plans. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as a violation of GitHub Acceptable Use Policies
-
|
Appreciate the effort, but this only addresses part of the problem. Many paying Antigravity subscribers were permanently banned without warning for using third-party tools they didn't know were prohibited. Sent emails remain unanswered. We need:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Didn’t the update just address these points (except for clear ToS, they make it vague to cover as much ground as possible) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It sure did! I'm happy I wasn't banned, I screwed up and when I realized it was against TOS I stopped |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Can you clarify if https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/overview#supported-features Code Assist Standard is only to be used with Gemini CLI? I suppose I cannot use the AI Pro / Ultra account with any other agentic harness (Pi etc)? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Replying to self - I got an update on X that this API only supported in "official workflows". https://x.com/LyalinDotCom/status/2030429730663551269?s=20 which means that the answer to my question is at the moment - No, I cannot use this API with other Agents. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We'll that's an amusing limitation. So there has to be a human behind cli, but in some cases, it also can be an automation, but not all automation. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's certainly a good way for Google to drive Devs to the competition. I was working on a Google Gemini CLI extension that uses the Google Antigravity Cloud Code API so I could fill a product gap in their own products. I wasn't using third party agents, I guess I was the third party in this case. banned 💀 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for clarification. Language of the ToS sounds strict, does that mean tools like https://www.openusage.ai/ are banned as well? From the language in ToS I believe so. I absolutely understand that you don't want users to use OpenClaw etc. and you want them to use your products in the way you intended to. But the usage quota monitoring is terrible and absolutely not transparent at the moment 😭 so the 3rd party tools for usage monitoring are basically must-have. And I don't think they would cause any high load to your servers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
such a big W |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
支持google毫不留情面的一本正经的打击哪些小偷小摸的坏分子 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is how it should have been handled from the start but I am very happy to see the change and communication. This is fair. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Do you still ban the whole Google account (Gmail, etc) in case of a violation? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is definitely a big concern that must be addressed and addressed favorably for the user: The risk of losing access to my 15+ years of Gmail/Drive address/account/data is insanely big. That risk is simply absent in other players' offerings, because unlike you, they don't happen to own the company of my mail provider. I cannot imagine choosing your offering in my right mind until you ensure the public that the bans are completely decoupled, i.e., any ban regarding Gemini/Antigravity will not impede one's access to any other Google service. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
no, at least not that I'm aware nor heard of. If anything, it's likely not related to Antigravity like logging in/out google multiple times and probably under different IPs could trigger the system flag as unusual/bot activity. Even then, you should be able to unlock from contacting support or simply completing a phone verification |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That is but one grievance with Google Accounts that's getting addressed here. Could you maybe extend the same self-serve unban to all the rest of Google services, and not ban the entire account when you permanently ban from Gemini? This is the reason why I'm not even considering using Gemini at all - there's just too much riding on my Google account, and it's onerous to create another one just to be able to safely pay you money. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What kind of people need to be told throwing bans around without warning or recourse is unacceptable before they fix it? Honestly, it just proves yet again that using Google services for anything is too much of a risk for any individual or business smaller than F500 to take. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Can you clarify the terms for Gemini CLI in particular? It's an open source project; is connecting to Google OAuth via forks prohibited? What about wrappers which utilize the ACP functionality? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What's next, telling us which browsers we are or aren't allowed to use to load https://google.com? It's an API. The client software is irrelevant. This is such nonsense. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Its not for api usage, its for oauth usage. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I pay 200$ to OpenAI and won't give a dime to google because of shit like this. Same with Anthropic, Nothing has changed in 26 years just because this is a "new" technology doesn't mean we're gonna put up with entirely new ways to be bilked. It's either full unfettered access through oauth or no money from me, and I wish other people would stop putting up with this bullshit. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You can get that at API rates, the only correct way to do so. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
no no, this isn't a sane limit or reaction to put on the service, shame on google for setting those terms and again for enforcing them with bans. what feature-request could be more clear?! the ban wasn't dished out for abuse, its for a less-profitable use of apis. the comment is blunt, but correctly calls out google's ridiculousness imo... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Not true, just received ban from google, only used the API key for opencode to coding python for my Oscilloscope data analysis, absolutely not using OAuth at all. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
So you are forcing your tools which aren't even safe, saw antigravity deleting user hard disk content and then apologizing for it. I'm using coding agent I've implemented for myself which places strict limits on what model can do and runs commands in rootless container. If I can't use gemini models with my tools in a cost effective way, I won't. Currently only Codex is available for me and I'm sticking to it. Also some Chinese open models, albeit less capable. Seeing Google or Anthropic actions I'm inclined to use and support Chinese models as much as I can, I cannot tolerate monopolistic behavior of western big tech. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
VertexAi is available for both Gemini and Claude models, as well as the open weight models you likely care about for a coding agent. A ton of models, all through the same API, auth, and billing. It's actually really nice. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I don't get it. What do you care which third party service we use? We still pay the pro account. The quotas will still make sure we don't overuse the service. Instead of bans you should consider that ppl want to use products like opencode instead of Gemini cli bc it sucks. Id like to stay a pro user as I access ai service across my account but if I get banned I happily switch to a different provider |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The monthly plan is discounted, but requires you use their products. Every provider is doing this, absorbing some of the cost to promote their products. Direct API access is available, but you have to pay by the token, which I'd argue is a good thing because it puts pressure on you to have higher quality instructions, agents, tools, and the like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Literally not true. Openai and Github Copilot are not banning people for using OAuth with opencode. No need to be hyperbolic. This is fundamentally a direct 1-1 analogy to right-to-repair. If I pay for something, I get to use it as I wish. If Google, a trillion dollar company, want to set rate limits they are free to do that. Forcing devs to use their buggy IDEs/harnesses is a stupid requirement. If I order takeaway, the restaurant cannot force me to use their plates - this does not imply I somehow stole more food than I ordered from them. It's a very simple concept to get one's head around actually. This is a losing strategy for Google because it will not increase their subs. I appreciate the clarification but will continue with cancelling my Ai Ultra now that things are clear and I cannot use the inference I paid for based on my preferred tooling. Yes, there are people stealing food from the McGoogle's - but treating all of your customers like those criminals is not going to be rewarded with continued $250pm custom. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
No, this isn't how online services have ever worked. You're paying for a service strictly under adherence to a TOS, that you agreed to. Google (and Anthropic) offer token based plans, with a much less restrictive TOS, that are closer to what you're looking for. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
South Park has a good episode about the kinds of things that can happen when you click "agree" without reading the terms of service. Most people will look at this and find it reasonable. There are abusers and a few people got caught up in it. Not the first context this has happened in, not the last time. I wonder what the ToS for the others say and if it's a matter of enforcement for them too. They can also be changed and I expect the industry to coalesce around this pattern anyway. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It was against the plantation owner's TOS to be a free man. I cannot explain the human spirit of freedom to a corporate robot, unfortunately. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Being banned from programming by an automatic judge. What a dystopian present - welcome to the future in which you are only allowed to program computers by the grace of Google/OpenAI/Anthropic. If their AI choose to kick you out then go get a job at the supermarket. The real issue here is not to get people unbanned. The real issue is to completely remove the concept of people being banned from programming without very significant oversight and recourse and general unwillingness on the part of Google to do so. Instead Google just builds it in...... hmmmm this maybe is crossing some counter/number/threshold, lets ban! customer.account.banImmediatelyWithNoRecourse() If Google had any real leadership they'd ban the ban except under the most utterly extreme circumstances. But that won't happen either - banning you from Gemini will just continue to be something the Google devs can throw in as some sort of error condition, or when their code doesn't understand something. Google should treat its customers like parents treat their children - with kindness, empathy and understanding - and execution is not one of the methods that parents use for addressing children's behavior problems, unlike Google, where execution of the customer is simply a thing a Google developer might choose to implement by calling the "banCustomerForever" endpoint. Again if there was any leadership at Google, that "ban customer account" endpoint would be literally removed so all the developers who have no understanding of consequences just don't have it as an option. There's SO MANY other options for addressing issues and Google takes none of them
but no, at Google they would rather put their customer accounts up against the wall and pull the trigger. There's just literally no human empathy to banning people from programming. Ironic. Google's willingness to end people's development career has to get to to the Justice Department to bring it permanently to an end. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
My accounts are still banned. I used google models inside pi and I was not sure I shouldn't be doing that. I wrote a mail to support team a week back and it is still locked and now I am not able to use gemini-cli or antigravity. I am gemini pro subscriber. gmail : rohithreddy1095@gmail.com. Request you to unlock. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Same except i was actually using antigravity itself when this happened! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
So google people randomly banning or they using some agent without human to do this ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Google should file a lawsuit against opencode owner for providing such a plugin or integration to Antigravity. For Antigravity subscribers, they thought it's legit because no one really reads ToC seriously. So banning massive Antigravity subscribers is a little unfair to be honest. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Not their fault if the community makes a plugin and the API is evidently that easy to reverse engineer and google has antitrust issues that would make suing little guys working in open source a bad look that other big LLM inference providers with media connections and that own the big open source platform that plugin came from would love to exploit to skew sentiment. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Providing a plugin for antigravity customers to use their own credentials to access the antigravity apis they already paid to have access to is entirely legal; furthermore publishing such software is itself harmless. Leave the lawyering to the lawyers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
？
…---- Replied Message ----
| From | Andres ***@***.***> |
| Date | 03/18/2026 06:59 |
| To | ***@***.***> |
| Cc | ***@***.***>***@***.***> |
| Subject | Re: [google-gemini/gemini-cli] Addressing Antigravity Bans & Reinstating Access (Discussion #20632) |
So the first suspension which was caused I think by signin to https://pi.dev/ was lifted in 3 days or so after the appeal (open gemini cli and follow the link)
The second as shown above was not restored and was caused by sign in to Jetbrains air.dev
In neither of these cases I was using gemini from this tools besides testing it can be done, the regular usage was always via gemini-cli.
I rarely used antigravity and did not sign in to other tools. To be honest at this moment, I would recommend more a codex/claude subscription for coding, if you need gemini models you could use something like Opencode Zen, GH copilot, or an api key.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
哦，知道你是来干嘛的？死妈就是死妈了，玩不起，不要玩
Oh, do you know what you're here for? Dead mom is dead mom, can't afford to play, don't play
…---- Replied Message ----
| From | ***@***.***> |
| Date | 03/20/2026 11:17 |
| To | ***@***.***> |
| Cc | ***@***.***>***@***.***> |
| Subject | Re: [google-gemini/gemini-cli] Addressing Antigravity Bans & Reinstating Access (Discussion #20632) |
@andresaraujo I'm sharing a similar experience with you. My Appeal Form doesn't get a response, nor do I find anywhere to ensure that it is really submitted and under processing.
What a terrible user experience, where you don't even know what's happening, or you're just stupidly waiting for nothing.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I got banned without knowing I'm breaking T&S. How can I get unbanned, it was a mistake. I've already submitted Appeal via Google Forms but no response yet. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
this is just not very clever from google they loose so many serious developers which understand the matter |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I got banned today trying to build a simple "ask gemini for a second opinion" skill to use via Claude Code 😂 Guess I won't then! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
What a pathetic behaviour and so low from you and your garbage company, you guys have a broken CLI, "high capacity" error from requests on every model for suscribers wasting real money on your product and banning legit users using Opencode, Openclaw or proxies?? STFU and fix your product and stop scam people banning your users, chatgpt dont ban people using third party software or proxies. I encourage other users to abuse 1 month pro trials and buy cheap suscriptions from chinese cd key shops... @jackwotherspoon you and your company are evil and dont deserve the money from people paying for this broken product. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预订后天kfc代吃业务。（50元）接4月1日订单，业务包括以下
1，当小丑向你表白，然后你拒绝，截图去装逼。（50元）
2，我配合你演戏表白成功，你截图去装逼。（50元）
3，预
…---- Replied Message ----
| From | ***@***.***> |
| Date | 03/29/2026 06:23 |
| To | ***@***.***> |
| Cc | ***@***.***>***@***.***> |
| Subject | Re: [google-gemini/gemini-cli] Addressing Antigravity Bans & Reinstating Access (Discussion #20632) |
4. Permanent ban: If an account is flagged for a second violation of ToS, it will be permanently banned.
What a pathetic behaviour and so low from you and your garbage company, you guys have a broken CLI, "high capacity" error from requests on every model for suscribers wasting real money on your product and banning legit users using Opencode, Openclaw or proxies??
STFU and fix your product and stop scam people banning your users, chatgpt dont ban people using third party software or proxies. I encourage other users to abuse 1 month pro trials and buy cheap suscriptions from chinese cd key shops... @jackwotherspoon you and your company are evil and dont deserve the money from people paying for this broken product.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I do not agree with the hateful tone in some of the comments here, but I do think this is a very poor decision. Because of this limitation, I will downgrade my plan after the trial and I have decided to stop using Antigravity as well. I wanted to keep subscriptions with each provider because I like following what is new in each platform, experimenting with different tools, and learning from the market as it evolves. That kind of openness is valuable for users, and it also helps providers, because many of us are not just consuming these products, we are actively learning, comparing, and helping push the ecosystem forward. This ban policy removes Google from the group of platforms that serious users can safely explore in that way. In practice, this ban policy pushes away exactly the kind of people who are deeply engaged with AI assistants and their development. Rate limiting could protect your systems just as well, without damaging the user experience in such a heavy-handed way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
They deserve the hateful tone and much worse things because they are SCAMMING people, they went from a broken product to a company FRAUD and @jackwotherspoon is a pathetic clown like everybody in the company supporting this totalitarian behaviour, they give us a broken product and even they are shameless enough to ban people for use 3rd party legit software or proxies, stop this abuse! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I was and am still banned in this new ban wave. I could not barely understand why, because ToS received all these discussions and despite not reading it (completely my fault here), no warning, message, email, contact, update, EVEN THE CONNECTION TO OAUTH COULD'VE FORCE-PRINTED WARNINGS, but as none was given, well... Who would believe that testing another CLI tool to compare the performance between Antigravity and it would ban me somehow. Crazy world, sure. However, I have a long opinion that combines parts of this discussion with my personal and unrequested POV as a user feedback. Since Antigravity nerfed Claude so hard or how people are also being banned without any returns from google (see this article). The quality of product is inferior in many ways to Claude models. The solution? Provide Claude models. Then, from unlimited usage, it became nerfed; which is reasonable. However, usage limits decreased constantly in the past few months despite new models from Claude being cheaper; then, by all sorts, Google also nerfed the models and restricted api/oauth. Even for alternative points of view and discussions, there are many-and when I mean many, be sure that there. are. many.-points of issues for antigravity. One of them was that a week ago, antigravity decided to burn ALL my limits in a single prompt that it failed to do and it was just a test message with a "hello world" as their servers went off. After HOURS on reddit and github, it was solved, but no apologies, no resolutions, just a "sorry, working on that", like yeah, it's not your money that is being paid in this service, so why not give a big middle finger. Very curious to see that google, having the money to buy Anthropic with spare change, is providing a service that is enraging, to say the least. I'll never continue to use google AI services if this type of issues doesn't see changes. Antigravity AND Gemini CLI are developer faced solutions, meaning that they should, AT LEAST, as a BARE MINIMUM, recognize that developers should be able to... develop? Kinda insane when you realize that ALL competitors allow usage off of theeir subscription on different engines such as Crush, pi, opencode, openclaw, claude code, etc.; not only because they should be able to, but because many researchers and developers from the opensource doesn't have the money to test all models in API plans (comparing to subscription models). Thing is, currently, even if they have conditions to, as the Google AI/LLM ecosystem is very limited in their subscriptions comparing to competitors, why would I come back to Google services when I'm completely limited, instead of subscribing my partner into Claude and using their account on my second projects or subscribing to gpt/copilot/kimi/minimax/glm/others? Because, to be completely honest, considering how Google is treating it's subscription plans users, why stay? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
i am still locked out with 4.5 days to go. I didn't do anything funny, all i have done is opened two antigravity instances one for coding the other for reading. Is that a crime now? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Apparently, it is |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Google are scammers and people behind gemini-cli and Antigravity are criminals now. This turned in a huge consumer fraude not letting us to use OUR paid suscription in whatever we want. @jackwotherspoon and his mafia are a shame for AI consumers and customers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @jackwotherspoon , My account (sephirxth@gmail.com) is still suspended after briefly using OpenClaw without knowing it violated the ToS. The automated unban doesn't seem to have reached me yet, and multiple appeals + emails to gemini-code-assist-user-feedback@google.com have gone unanswered. I'm a long-term paying subscriber and researcher. All third-party integrations have been removed. Could someone please review my case? Thank you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
and others
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Over the past week, we saw reports from Gemini CLI users experiencing account disruptions. These were the result of a series of Antigravity bans rolled out to address violations of the Antigravity Terms of Service (ToS), specifically the use of 3rd party tools or proxies to access Antigravity resources and quotas.
Because of the backend layer where abuse prevention occurs, bans for Antigravity usage also blocked access to Gemini CLI and Gemini Code Assist. We acknowledge the disruption this caused and are taking steps to restore access.
⏪ Bans have been reset
In coordination with Antigravity we are conducting a system-wide automated unban for accounts recently flagged for breaking ToS. This means:
🔄 New self-service reinstatement process
Going forward if an account is flagged for violating ToS, the experience will change:
💡 Clarifying Gemini CLI ToS Policy
Using third-party software, tools, or services to harvest or piggyback on Gemini CLI's OAuth authentication to access our backend services is a direct violation of Gemini CLI’s applicable terms and policies.
We believe this new automated process provides a fair way for users who unintentionally broke the ToS to remediate their status while keeping our services secure and available.
Thank you for your patience and for your continued support of Gemini CLI!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions